Promoters of sex education knew just how to take advantage of and to tear down the natural parental modesty that protects the mystery of the pro-creative act. Introductory meetings often poked fun at normal parental reluctance. Yet parents thought that if the schools were going to deal with the subject, they certainly should do a good job. Teachers were trained to teach a whole lot about sex, sex as recreation, not as procreation. Furthermore teachers were trained how to crush parental interference. Sex education began infiltrating the schools in the 1960’s and the entire academic direction and purpose of education has been harmed and the damage to the children is immeasurable.
Sex education is a K through 12 mandated curriculum found in blatantly sexual on-going programs such as Benziger Family Life Program (one of the oldest in use) and Growing in Love (the newest), but is also integrated into other subject areas, as well. For example, descriptive sex acts, filthy sexual language, and using the Lord’s name in vain is often found in required readings. Students who have become desensitized to sexual language in elementary school are no longer shocked by the explicit sex descriptions in such literature as The Learning Tree by Gordon Parks and I know why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou when they reach middle school. One of the filthiest films Not a Love Story, which showed scenes of actual acts from the seedy sexual underworld in graphic detail, was passed off as women studies. Sex education, is not just the birds and bees biological type information parents want to believe, it is part of a destructive methodology that invaded and altered the entire academic and intellectual direction. |
|
|
|
|